I’ve been on vacation, seeking a different level of balance and some veg time. I read a couple of mysteries, explored some of Canada’s Eastern Townships, and then lessened the activity to increase the quiet and still time.

Filling up days with places and events is often considered a great vacation. And great it is if not for beginning and ending with exhaustion. Its restorative score could be low, as most often vacations are expected to provide a break from schedules and their pressures as experienced in daily routines. A change in place, without pace, doesn’t always leave the residual effect anticipated with a vacation.

And while a change in pace, and not place, may serve up most of the benefits sought, vacations, we should note, are personal, and preferences as such will vary. The key is balance, something we all need and seem to believe is more achievable while on vacation.

Balance can be as elusive as the universal sought after happiness. And there’s a reason: they are intertwined with our state of mind. So while a change in pace or place seem appropriate for creating balance, neither provide a guarantee for a great vacation.

When I think of vacation I’m reminded of the carefree, imaginative and fun-filled days of childhood summers. Playing was the balance I needed then, and now. From creating our Indian village to spending hours throughout the day and evening at the local pool, to climbing a rock face of one of the bluffs overlooking the Mississippi, I was free to explore, create and experience. Our play was simply accepted, with few boundaries. And the appropriate level of silliness was always balanced with equal seriousness.

Self-expression flowed, and laughter came easy and often as we were loving life. With our laughter, we were releasing plenty of those healthy endorphins, which by the way are 10 times more powerful than the pain-relieving drug morphine. And no doubt we were increasing our little hearts’ rate, as in addition to the physical activity, our endless laughter gave it a boost. FYI, just a few minutes of laughter can double your heart rate, according to Dr. William Fry, Jr.

I’ve mentioned this before, but it bears repeating: As children we laughed on average 400 times a day; by age 35 we’ve reduced that to 15. So creating a more healthy balance truly does require a bit more play and laughter, in both the mental and physical sense.

For me, there’s nothing more fun than wandering and pondering. Wandering to see and experience new things, like dark chocolate enrobed blueberries we purchased at the Saint-Benoit-du-Lac Abbey. A burst of fresh berry flavor surprised us, because it was truly fresh and truly a burst.

As for pondering, time is given to those things that just don’t make their way into my brainscape during the normal course of a week. Topic matters not because vacation offers a chance to twirl anything and everything around and peer at them from different perspectives. My mental escapades are free to involve matters of the farfetched and otherwise inconceivable.

Play, mental and physical, has been recognized as a key ingredient of well being and happiness for centuries. Aristotle and Plato spoke of such beliefs. On through history, these beliefs have gained merit through the studies of the brain pertaining to the development and education of children, problem solving, creativity, relationships at home and work, as well as team performances.

According to one study, Schaeffer 1993, play is as important to human happiness and well-being as love and work. By nature we are born to play. It’s a source of energy and excitement, stimulating our bodies and brains. At the same time it provides for calmness, relaxation and improved sleep. Vacations that incorporate play are downright therapeutic.

It has been said that you can discover more about a person in an hour of play than in a year of conversation. I suspect the same is true in exploration of our selves. I’ve not happened upon too many down sides to play, other than the occasional skinned knee.

So with a hop and a skip, unleash yourself. Get in the spirit, stay in the spirit, be the spirit needed to jump into a fun-filled vacation. Giggle and laugh as if you’ve never grown up. Let vacation be like skinny dipping, where without hesitation you leap in. No clothes, no second thoughts are necessary as you understand life is not a dress rehearsal. Allow yourself to recapture the carefree feelings and well-being of childhood.

Anita Ancel is President of Ancelary Group, a Vermont firm that helps executives and their teams develop attitudes and habits for ongoing success and happiness.

Intuitively it makes sense that transparency with employees allows for greater engagement and more lucrative financial outcomes. Leaders who are transparent evoke trust and a higher level of loyalty.

That newspaper turnaround that I mentioned a few weeks back was accomplished by opening the books and sharing financial results on a monthly basis. It empowered employees to participate in developing new and better processes and products.

I didn’t really think about transparency as putting the employee first, but that’s exactly what it does. And when you take care of the employee, they in turn feel compelled to take care of the customer.

In the latest Inc. magazine, Matt Blumberg, CEO and chairman of the New York company Return Path, talks about transparency and how he has ranked the shareholder behind the customer, who comes after the employee.

Shortly after hiring a Vice President of People to formalize and preserve the company’s culture, Blumberg’s philosophy of transparency and employees first was put to the royal business test. He and his team had decided to sell off part of the company, and proceeded to struggle with what to tell the staff.

The top team was divided, debating about impact from competitors and clients, potential workplace anxiety and talent flight, as well as the trust factor. Blumberg resorted to calling his executive coach, who was able to help him figure out how to maintain alignment with the company’s values and culture. Employees heard it first hand from Blumberg.

In the end, a sale didn’t take place. That portion of the business was broken off into a separate entity, and all continue to prosper.

Prosper and transparency are heard in conjunction more and more. Case in point, the man who wrote the book, Employees First, Customers Second, heads up the fastest growing and most profitable global IT services company. Business Week lists it as one of the 20 most influential companies in the world.

CEO Vineet Nayar, flipped the org chart upside down and made management accountable to HCL Tech’s 57,000 employees five years ago. It’s not just lip service, either. Performance appraisals of all HCL senior managers are posted on the company’s intranet. You can’t get more transparent than that.

Nayar is all about embracing change. He says Gen Y will require high transparency in business. After all it is the generation that grew up in the Facebook community, where they share all.

His implementation strategy incorporates what has been on the business platform for sometime, at least in discussion. It includes creating urgency, sharing the current state so employees can see future possibilities, building trust through transparent communication, nurturing an entrepreneurial mindset, and decentralizing decision-making.

In addition, he transfers the ownership of change to employees. That pretty much gives them license to do some of the driving, or to take the lead so to speak.

Change is known as The New Normal at HCL. Employees are put front and center. You can see for yourself at Unstructure.org, where videos from the company’s conference can be seen.

The opening video is all about kids’ perspectives. And from their mouths, we can hear how change is, indeed, the new normal. Internet is listed among the planets, and as for marriage, the chapel will be left behind for a Facebook ceremony.

Why not follow Nayar’s lead and welcome some of this change inside the walls of our business? There have been enough success stories to show it works. It’s time to believe and get on with empowering employees.
Anita Ancel is President of Ancelary Group, a Vermont firm that helps executives and their teams develop attitudes and habits for ongoing success.

A few weeks ago I likened a business environment heavy with policy to the culture of a prison. My point was that managing for the worst case employee makes everyone an offender, disengaging them and costing the bottom line.

Let me be the first to say, “Shame on me,” for I was acting as if all prisons are awful places. I stand corrected. There are lessons to be learned from what is tagged as the most humane prison in the world. Located in Norway, Halden Fengsel is featured in this week’s Time magazine.

Before you dismiss me as a nut case, read just a bit further. Let’s treat this as a business case study, relating it to motivating and engaging employees. We’ll judge success on bottom line results as they relate to the vision, mission and core values.

For fairness sake, we need to admit upfront that motivating murderers, rapists and drug dealers to align with the prison’s goals is a bit more of a challenge than getting qualified employees to do likewise for a business. While prisoners are more of a captive audience, their attitudes are generally not conducive to collaboration. And we all know the difference a bad attitude can make.

A prison’s short term goal is to separate criminals from the rest of society. The longer term mission is to rehab criminals, helping them to become contributing citizens instead of repeat offenders. The vision, therefore, is to create a safer world, reducing crime and its overall cost to society.

Halden succeeds on all fronts, especially when compared to the United States. After two years, Time reports, Norway’s recidivism rate is 20 percent, compared to 50 to 60 percent in our country. And there are fewer criminals: 69 per 100,000 people in Norway, to 759 in the U.S.

The spread in these prison success rates can be likened to those established between businesses with the most and least engaged employees. To state the obvious, it’s significant. And in both situations success can be linked directly to the valuing and treatment of individuals.

The Towers Watson 2010 Global Workforce Study, involving 20,000 employees in 22 markets, concludes just that. For businesses to experience optimum results, according to the study, they will need to “create a more personalized work experience and foster self reliance by enabling employees to build their skills, plan for their financial future and live healthy lives…”

In this workforce study as well as the previous one, the relationship between leadership and employees is tagged as being critical. Trust, respect and appreciation for employees are among the gauges that have been correlated with business growth.

Back at the Norway prison, we learn that Halden’s greatest asset may be the relationship between the managing staff and inmates. Instead of carrying guns, guards share meals and engage in sports with those serving sentences.

Referring to them as pupils, the goal is to give inmates “a meaningful life inside these walls.” Through education and work, the intent is to “build them up (and) give them confidence.”

The culture is one of family, and the environment one that could easily be referred to as “home, sweet, home” With long windows to let sunlight in, flat screen TVs, mini fridges and shared kitchens and living rooms, inmates are given comforts unlike most of their real homes.

And not unlike business climate studies, Halden surveys inmates to find out how the prison experience can be improved. It’s a partnership, with organizational and personal goals being respected and realized.

For those who think a prison’s business is that of punishment, I remind you that our own penal system is costly proof that doesn’t work. And for those who think businesses can’t afford the attention or expense to provide much beyond a paycheck for employees, I ask you to compare your results to those companies with engaged employees. You’ll think differently.

Last week I wrote about how leadership development is part of the Israel curriculum via mandatory service in their non-hierarchical military. And that has in turn created a culture of success where everyone is expected to be a leader, as described in Start Up Nation by Dan Senor and Saul Singer.

It’s not uncommon when we hear about a success elsewhere to reason why it wouldn’t be a good fit for our situation. So forgive me for repeating myself, I believe it is just the right fit for corporate America. Expecting everyone to be a leader has been my belief for as long as I can remember.

Tom Peters and others often referred to this as employee empowerment. Examples often involved the freedom to handle customer service issues without having to check in at various levels in the chain of command. Israel shows that true empowerment involves all decisions and every employee.

Rather than just spew hot air, I thought it would be appropriate to share an example of how I have practiced this belief. It was the mid 90s and I had just garnered the position of being publisher of a small Midwest newspaper. However I was soon to learn there was a catch.

Seems the paper was bleeding money; the bottom line was dropping out of sight. My job was to do emergency surgery and amputate some human appendages. I was handed a list of names of the people to cut. Thoughts of career advancement soon became visions of another job from hell.

I accepted the job, and at the same time objected. In so doing I somehow convinced the boss to give me some time before demanding staff eliminations. And so, as is the case in fairytales, this story ends with everyone living happily ever after.

The staff was terrific and just wanted to be unleashed. We did leadership and team training across disciplines, often in the form of games. We practiced transparency; the books were open for all to see the details. And everyone literally signed off on being responsible for their own and the team’s success.

We painted our commitment on the wall. Surrounded by our colorful handprints and signatures was the statement: We stand apart as individuals. We come together in a common purpose. It’s a statement that implies the value and responsibility of each member of the team. And that was key.

We had different roles but did not practice different status. The same level of commitment, responsibility and leadership was expected from the janitor as from a department head. It served us well.

One Saturday night the driver, who transported our papers from the off site printing facility, checked the paper for quality before loading. He discovered that the previous day’s sports section had been printed and included again.

He, of course, spoke to the press foreman on duty, who in so many words said “tough.” Remember, we were a small paper. Needless to say this operation did not share a culture similar to ours. So here was Saturday’s press run with Friday’s sports pages. Anyone who’s worked in customer service knows this kind of error is remembered for decades.

Not to worry. True leaders don’t give up easily and neither did our driver. When the printers did not recognize him as a leader, he called me, knowing that I did and would welcome his call at 3 a.m. Sad to say, the title of publisher was all it took for our printers to decide they needed to crank up the press again.

This driver was also the mastermind behind several successful revenue ideas. He, along with all the others, led the way to success. The bottom line was proof that everyone being a leader works. In that first year the newspaper made more money than at any other time. No one was cut from the staff.

From there, we went onto to help our down trodden community realize new possibilities. We extended our ideas of leadership beyond our walls.

It was challenging, fun and rewarding for everyone. And, like in Israel, it was successful. The principles behind why it works are really quite simple. Everyone, individually, wants to be successful, and at the same time be part of a winning team. It’s that combo of personal and organizational goals that is so motivating.

So I encourage you to give it a try. Lead on, shoulder to shoulder, with everyone in your organization.

True leadership isn’t about leading others, but rather yourself as you interact with the world.  In business, that would mean everyone in the organization is a leader, with all the responsibility and say that comes with such a position.

 I can imagine for some that sounds like a great formula for chaos and a clashing of egos. It might also be viewed as counterproductive, causing conflict and confusion.

Let’s play this out a bit further. The expectation would be for every employee to ask questions, challenge and debate everything. The new comfort zone would be the unknown. Being different in thought and action would be the company norm, and problems would naturally become assets.

Can’t quite see it resulting in business nirvana?  There’s real world evidence that this type of operation not only works, but outperforms the traditional, hierarchical organization. I’m not talking about an exception, for there are many examples. Intel and Google will attest to such successes, for they have cashed in on them, both by investing and reaping the subsequent rewards.

You need only check NASDAQ for Israeli companies, for they outnumber those from all of Europe, Japan, China, India, Korea and Singapore combined. Israel has become the No. 1 country for start-up ventures. That’s a lot of chutzpah for such a young, small and war-entrenched country.

Got your attention?  Start Up Nation, a book by Dan Senor and Saul Singer had mine as they described how this country’s culture of adversity spawns global successes. 

Through the many stories the authors make it clear that from birth, Israelis are taught a mindset that allows for nothing to get in their way. It is an attitude befitting great leaders.

            Right out of high school everyone goes into the military, one where soldiers can oust their leaders for poor performance… and one where life and death situations require quick decisions and total responsibility. Hierarchy becomes irrelevant when survival is a way of life.

            Israel was able to attract Bill Gates and Warren Buffet into the war zone of  their homeland because the same winning mindset and cultural candor prevails in business as does on the battlefield. But then business takes place on the battlefield.

            During the Gulf War in 1991, Intel Israel continued work despite the government order to shut down all schools and businesses.  Employees donned their gas masks and demonstrated their determination.

 In 2006, just a couple of months after Buffet bought the company, Iscar, more than 4,000 missiles landed in northern Israel. His Israeli chairman assured him that while the sole concern was for employee safety, all customers would receive their orders on time. And despite many employees relocating to the south, the chairman kept his word.

            Life in Israel has demanded a no B.S. manner of interaction, adaptability, persistence, collaboration and creativity. When 98- degree salt water was the result of drilling for drinking water, they created pools and began to raise warm-water fish like sea bass. After use in the fishponds, the water and the waste byproducts made great fertilizer for the olive and date trees. Once a land of deserts, referred to as a barren wasteland, Israel now grows 240 million trees. 

Seems nothing is impossible for them. They are a nation of individual leaders who team up to conquer any and all challenges. They find no need for water cooler talk, frankness serves them well. Trust develops naturally.  Problems and differences are reasons to get creative and adaptability makes way for easy navigation of the unfamiliar. Responsibility is an expectation of everyone. Risk and mistakes are redefined, eliminating reason for hesitation.

So if it can work in the small nation of Israel, where killer obstacles seem to be in abundance, who can argue that it wouldn’t work for corporate America? In terms of team building, it would require storming to go beyond one stage of development and become an ongoing norm.  That can be tough on CEO egos and wreak havoc with their comfort zones. But imagine what it could do for the bottom line.

I’ve just scratched the surface on what this book can teach us. It is well worth the time to read it and the opportunity to challenge your own thinking. At the very least, you’ll find the illustrative stories inspiring.

            After reveling in an absolutely breath-taking Easter Sunday, I spent Monday immersed in appreciation and positive wonderment. In business speak, that translates to participating in an appreciative inquiry approach to strategic planning with the Vermont Peace Academy.  Our guides were members of the Woodbury Institute of Champlain College’s masters program in Mediation and Applied Conflict Studies.

            Problems and negativity were banished, creating space for sharing stories about “the best” in practices and outcomes. Happy memories, feelings of satisfaction and a true sense of fulfillment permeated the gathering as the realization of having made a positive difference was confirmed story after story.

            As is the intent with appreciative inquiry, energy grew and possibilities emerged. The result, as some might suspect, was not an endless meandering among options, but a fairly quick and unanimous decision on direction. You couldn’t have asked for greater clarity.

            And this was just step one.  Yet to come are the Dreaming of what could be with this chosen direction, Designing the path to the dream or ideal, and then Delivering the dream.  

            This approach is totally foreign to most.  Whether developing a business course of action or an individual plan for life, we tend to focus on fixing what’s wrong, shoring up perceived weaknesses and dealing with competitive fears.

            Case in point, when doing the typical SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) exercise with clients, the threats and weaknesses lists tend to be about twice as long.

            I know it can be hard to imagine how you arrive at a solid plan without some consideration of weaknesses or problems.  Appreciative Inquiry isn’t blind to all problems per se; resolved problems are incorporated.  They blend into the fabric of success, for they are worked through along the way, creating processes and methods upon which to build.

            You might be surprised to learn that the outcome of this approach and the traditional one is often the same. That is, in action steps.  What varies greatly is the level of energy and enthusiasm created for the pursuit of the resulting plan. And that has a direct correlation with level of success realized.

           This was the case in working with one of the development departments of the United Nations.  Julian Portilla, director of the masters program and one of the day’s facilitators, shared that the U.N. participants had experienced a very contentious planning process the year prior, and so were reaching out for a better, less distressful way.

            However, it took a bit to move beyond the pain of some of their experiences, such as the genocide in Rwanda. The essence of their work took them to places most of us can’t imagine going. And yet amazing stories emerged, making way for discovering the positive and correlating lessons learned. “Provocative propositions,” Julian said, were the result.

            At the end of the three days, having worked through the Design phase, the 45 participants were surprised when Julian pulled from his pocket the results of the previous year’s planning.  They were almost identical to what had just been decided.  And so he asked, “How do you feel this year?  How did you feel last year? ”

            You know the answers.  Instead of dragging themselves back to work after another draining planning effort, this year they left excited to get started. 

            Imagine the energy.  Linking it to Einstein’s work on relativity, the increased velocity of this mass of 45 people vibrating with increased excitement for the Dream, creates a powerful momentum. And as mentioned in past blogs, there’s nothing like the power of engaged employees to get the desired results.

            Refreshed and somewhat tan, I just returned from Jamaica where warmth, both in weather and smiles, prevail.  Not surprising, the lyrics of Bob Marley’s carefree song, “Don’t Worry, Be Happy,” continue to play in my head.

            My mindset became an amusing juxtaposition as I picked up the New Yorker from the mail pile and began to read  Elizabeth Kolbert’s article, Everybody Have Fun; What can policymakers learn from happiness research?

            The simple answer to that question is “not much.”  The research, for the most part, scratched the surface and asked the same old questions.  Happiness, after all, is not a new phenomenon for this century. Philosophers, psychologists and people in general have long tried to universally define happiness.

            It’s not just a matter for public policy, as has made the news globally from Bhutan to Europe and the U.S., but also for business practices. Engaged employees, a.k.a. happy employees, are all the rage now that it’s been shown bottom lines are all the healthier because of them.

            The business world has made progress. It’s realizing that happiness in the work place goes beyond the pay check. Just as in society, money can’t buy happiness. It’s a tool that’s helpful, but more money does not equal more happiness.

            And that’s just what the research showed in Kolbert’s article. A 1978 study asked lottery winners, quadriplegics and a control group about their happiness before and after their life-changing events.  There were no real distinctions between the groups; money didn’t increase happiness and physical limitations didn’t eliminate it.

            Other data showed that despite increases in Americans’ income, house size and number of cars, levels of happiness have “remained virtually unchanged” for the past 50 years.  In addition, countries with lower per capita income levels often register higher average happiness levels.

            These are not new revelations.  And yet we, as a society, can’t seem to let go of falsehoods that have us believing more is better, and one’s net worth directly correlates with one’s level of happiness.

            It was in 1943 that Abraham Maslow presented the hierarchy of needs, detailing how one’s basic needs must be met before one can aspire to such things as self-esteem and self actualization.  Meeting basic needs does not translate into happiness any more than superseding them, however it allows one to move beyond survival and onto living.

            While policy holders and business leaders can and should create environments and conditions conducive to happiness, they cannot ensure it. Our Founding Fathers had it right when they included the pursuit of happiness among the fundamental rights.  Happiness is not something to be given, but pursued.  It’s personal, and it’s a choice.

            Not to be confused with pleasure and satisfaction, happiness is an active state of being, not fleeting feelings. It is unique to each person, with the best definition being self actualization.

            The legend about the ancient tribal leaders who struggled with where to hide the secret of happiness concurs.  Foregoing the highest mountains, the deepest ocean waters and the core of the earth, they chose to hide it in the heart of each individual.  They assumed it was the one spot where it would remain unfound.

            So let’s end the centuries-old debate, and encourage some personal expeditions into the heart of happiness.  That better work place and world will follow.          

            This month’s Entrepreneur magazine shares some interesting, and opposing, perspectives on engaging employees in behaviors that have positive outcomes for the business.  The cultural implications couldn’t be more disparate.

            In one article, a Midwestern credit union has banished Facebook and Twitter from the work place, and is about to forbid cell phones on the premises. Seems management’s repeated attempts to get employees to be more focused on the customer and their jobs have failed.

            It was noted that they want to trust their people to do the right thing.   But instead, have concluded “the only way we can let people know we’re serious, and really discipline hard-core offenders, is by instituting a uniform policy banning cell phones.”

            It’s not that I’m opposed to having principles by which everyone operates, but the message that is being sent by this company is just the opposite of what they say they want.  The reasoning behind the rules will breed distrust, and distance employees even more from the company.

            I have observed first hand that managing for the worst case scenario creates a culture that begins to feel like a prison.  James Autry, author of For Love and Profit, has spoken to this issue many times.  Creating policies in like manner of this credit union, is shirking management responsibilities and taking the easy way out.  Autry’s and my advice would be the same: If there are offenders, deal with them, one on one.  Do not treat everyone like an offender.

            A few pages further in the magazine we find an article that might be helpful to this credit union.  It’s titled: “Creating a culture of Excellence.”  Citing examples of what is done by 10 companies that are getting it right, Jennifer Wang says the prevailing theme is that leaders are visible and show they value each employee. And the result: an incredibly high level of trust.  

            It’s conceivable that the examples given in this one article will not be enough to convince the credit union or any company that is of like mind.  So let me recommend a quick read of The Dream Manager by Matthew Kelly. 

            It all begins with a janitorial service business that has high turnover, unhappy clients and a decreasing bottom line.  It seems to be a hopeless situation.  But there’s a happy ending, for both the company and the employees.

            The turnaround starts with some simple dialogue. The solutions came as a collaborative effort: Management asked, employees talked, management listened and together they made improvements.

            Going deeper, the management style transformed into one that, like the companies Wang lists, recognizes employees are whole people, with needs, hopes and dreams of their own.  When the work place incorporates avenues for employees to accomplish personal goals along with company goals, it becomes a magical place.

            It’s what we refer to today as engaged employees. And as Towers Watson attest, those companies with highly engaged employees out perform the others significantly.

            At the end of the day, you have to engage the hearts and minds, along with the feet and hands to have a winning work place team.

            In various leadership positions throughout my career, I’ve often thought if I could wave a magic wand I would want to give people confidence.  I had observed that confident people behaved differently. For the most part, they seemed less defensive. 

            Upon further observation, it became clear that confidence was not something that was always experienced holistically.  For example, I’ve coached some folks that are very confident in their abilities to do their job, but not so confident in the value of themselves as individuals. Therefore, defensiveness emerged.

            Then there are those who are so confident that their defensiveness is elevated to arrogance, and takes on the face of bullying, diminishing anyone who questions them.

            Carol S. Dweck addresses these behavior differences more eloquently in her book, mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Rather than speak of them in terms of confidence, she talks about their mindset and how that translates into behavioral styles.

            In examples of what most would consider successful people, she draws lines of distinction by detailing values and coinciding behaviors.  She would no more put John McEnroe in the same athletic ranks with Michael Jordan and Babe Ruth, than she would group Lee Iacocca and Steve Case with CEO greats Jack Welch and Lou Gerstner.

            And here’s why. McEnroe, Iacocca and Case share what Dweck terms a “fixed” mindset, whereas Jordan, Ruth, Welch and Gerstner share a “growth” mindset. The differences are as stark as being billions in the red as opposed to billions in the black.

            Giant egos, airs of superiority and constant parading of their greatness are characteristics of the fixed mindset group.  Abuse and judgment of the underlings, especially the most competent, is routine and required to uphold the self-created royal status of fixed-mindset leaders. Talent, not effort, is supreme.

            McEnroe blamed losses on many things, but never himself.  The responsibility didn’t lie with him, so neither did the fix.  He even blamed his temper tantrums on others for having allowed them.  Jordan and Ruth, in contrast, looked losses in the face and increased efforts to improve their games.        Likewise Iacocca and Case sat atop success with the sole focus of elevating their self-image. All the while, Chrysler and AOL Time Warner danced with disaster.  True to their fixed mindset, both CEOs lost their crowns but not their elitist attitudes.

            With a switch in mindsets, it was human potential, teamwork and growth that drove Welch and Gerstner. Like the spotlighted Undercover CEOs of the current TV program, they went to the ranks and thrived on good communication.

            Turf wars were banned, credit shared and mentoring replaced blame.  The “Royal I” was no where to be found, resulting in wins all around, including nothing less than stellar financial gains for GE and IBM.

            So you see, while confidence is a characteristic linked to leadership, it alone does not guarantee a leadership style that is respected and sustains success.  True leadership, after all, is only sustainable through the engagement and growth of self and others.  Dweck’s book does a great job substantiating this through a collection of detailed examples.